Grid tie Vs off- grid:
I am usually asked this question of whether you are giving grid tie, without a battery bank?
What I do not understand is, People have some kind of a hatred towards Batteries, No idea why. Tell you what, as long as hydrogen storage and usage technologies does not come into the public domain we are stuck with the batteries.
Why Batteries? The production of electricity even from a nuclear plant is uneven, A battery regularizes the output, i.e. excess production is stored and provides balance during low production, maintaining a constant production. So in a solar power-plant system, battery is in a continuous charging or discharging state. Most of the solar packages comes with tower batteries/ tubular batteries, they have a long life, it can be used for 5 - 7years and is totally dependent on how we maintain it.
Grid tie also requires battery, against the common belief that it does not. Due to the unstable production from solar panels, a battery bank has to provided to regularize current. A hydro-electric power station, pumps excess water back into reservoir with excess current, and uses this water to balance out the failing production, certain diesel's compresses flue gasses into the earth, which on retrieval, balances the low production.
Types on inverters : grid ties is a very costly affair and you need to invest only when you have plans to feed current back to the grid, if you planning for an in-house usage, or if reverse feeding lines are not available then there is another option which can be almost 40 - 50% more cheaper. Most companies provide you with an inverter and the change over from mains has to done manually, while a solar home ups has a built in charge controller which, once the batteries are fully charged and, if there is production then it gives that current into the mains directly and only excess requirement need to supplied by EB. The problem with inverters is that, the excess current drains off into the earth, which is a direct wastage of electricity.
I am usually asked this question of whether you are giving grid tie, without a battery bank?
What I do not understand is, People have some kind of a hatred towards Batteries, No idea why. Tell you what, as long as hydrogen storage and usage technologies does not come into the public domain we are stuck with the batteries.
Why Batteries? The production of electricity even from a nuclear plant is uneven, A battery regularizes the output, i.e. excess production is stored and provides balance during low production, maintaining a constant production. So in a solar power-plant system, battery is in a continuous charging or discharging state. Most of the solar packages comes with tower batteries/ tubular batteries, they have a long life, it can be used for 5 - 7years and is totally dependent on how we maintain it.
Grid tie also requires battery, against the common belief that it does not. Due to the unstable production from solar panels, a battery bank has to provided to regularize current. A hydro-electric power station, pumps excess water back into reservoir with excess current, and uses this water to balance out the failing production, certain diesel's compresses flue gasses into the earth, which on retrieval, balances the low production.
Types on inverters : grid ties is a very costly affair and you need to invest only when you have plans to feed current back to the grid, if you planning for an in-house usage, or if reverse feeding lines are not available then there is another option which can be almost 40 - 50% more cheaper. Most companies provide you with an inverter and the change over from mains has to done manually, while a solar home ups has a built in charge controller which, once the batteries are fully charged and, if there is production then it gives that current into the mains directly and only excess requirement need to supplied by EB. The problem with inverters is that, the excess current drains off into the earth, which is a direct wastage of electricity.